How is Systemic and Constructionist Therapy Change Process Narrated in Retrospective Accounts of Therapy? A Systematic Meta-synthesis Review.

Despite the considerable potential of qualitative approaches for studying the systemic and constructionist therapy process due to shared theoretical and epistemological premises, to date there is lack of a comprehensive qualitative synthesis of how change process is experienced and conceptualized by clients and therapists. To address this evidence gap, we performed a systematic meta-synthesis review of 30 studies reporting clients' and therapists' retrospective narratives of change process across systemic and constructionist models and across a range of client configurations, including individuals, couples, families, and groups. The studies were identified following a systematic search in PsycINFO and MEDLINE resulting in 2,977 articles, which were screened against eligibility criteria. Thematic analysis led to the identification of four main themes: (1) navigating through differences, (2) toward nonpathologizing construction of problems, (3) navigating through power imbalances, and (4) toward new and trusting ways of relating. Findings illustrate the multifaceted aspects of systemic and constructionist change process, the importance for their reflexive appraisal, and the need for further research contributing to the understanding of the challenges inherent in the systemic and constructionist therapeutic context.

A pesar del potencial considerable de los enfoques cualitativos para estudiar el proceso de la terapia sistémica y construccionista debido a premisas teóricas y epistemológicas compartidas, hasta la fecha hay una escasez de síntesis cualitativas completas de cómo los pacientes y los terapeutas viven y conceptualizan el proceso de cambio. Para abordar esta falta de datos, realizamos una revisión sistemática de la metasíntesis de 30 estudios que informan historias retrospectivas de los pacientes y los terapeutas del proceso de cambio entre modelos sistémicos y construccionistas y entre una variedad de configuraciones de pacientes, entre ellas, individuos, parejas, familias y grupos. Los estudios se identificaron después de una búsqueda sistemática en PsycINFO y MEDLINE, de donde se obtuvieron 2,977 artículos, que se analizaron según los criterios de elegibilidad. El análisis temático condujo a la identificación de cuatro temas principales: 1) orientarse entre las diferencias, 2) hacia una construcción no patologizante de los problemas, 3) orientarse entre los desequilibrios de poder, 4) hacia formas nuevas y confiables de relacionarse. Los resultados ilustran los aspectos multifacéticos del proceso de cambio sistémico y construccionista, la importancia para su valoración reflexiva y la necesidad de más investigaciones que contribuyan a la comprensión de los desafíos inherentes en el contexto terapéutico sistémico y construccionista.

The Discursive Performance of Change Process in Systemic and Constructionist Therapies: A Systematic Meta-Synthesis Review of In-Session Therapy Discourse.

Despite the emphasis of systemic and constructionist approaches on discourse and interaction, to date there has been no comprehensive overview of how change process is performed within in-session therapeutic dialogue. In this paper, we present a qualitative meta-synthesis of 35 articles reporting systemic and constructionist therapy process data from naturally occurring therapeutic dialogue. The studies were selected following the screening against eligibility criteria of a total sample of 2,977 studies identified through a systematic search of PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases. Thematic analysis of the 35 studies' findings identified four main themes depicting change process performance: (a) shifting to a relational perspective, (b) shifting to non-pathologizing therapeutic dialogue, (c) moving-forward dialogue, and (d) the dialogic interplay of power. Findings highlight the interactional and discursive matrix within which systemic and constructionist change process occurs. Findings illuminate the value of qualitative research studies sampling naturally occurring therapeutic discourse in bringing this matrix forth, particularly when utilizing discursive methodologies like conversation or discourse analysis.

A pesar del énfasis de los enfoques sistémicos y construccionistas sobre el discurso y la interacción, hasta ahora no se ha hecho una descripción general completa de cómo se lleva a cabo el proceso de cambio dentro del diálogo terapéutico en la sesión. En este artículo presentamos una metasíntesis cualitativa de 35 artículos que informan datos del proceso de terapia sistémica y construccionista obtenidos del diálogo terapéutico que se produce naturalmente. Los estudios se eligieron siguiendo los criterios de evaluación por elegibilidad de una muestra total de 2977 estudios detectados mediante una búsqueda sistemática en las bases de datos PsycINFO y MEDLINE. El análisis temático de los resultados de los 35 estudios identificó cuatro temas principales que describen la representación del proceso de cambio; (a) el cambio a una perspectiva relacional, (b) el cambio a un diálogo terapéutico no patologizante, (c) el diálogo de avance, y (d) la interacción dialógica del poder. Los resultados destacan la matriz interactiva y discursiva dentro de la cual se produce el proceso de cambio sistémico y construccionista. Los resultados ilustran el valor de los estudios de investigación cualitativa que muestrean el discurso terapéutico producido naturalmente a la hora de presentar esta matriz, particularmente cuando se utilizan metodologías discursivas, como el análisis de la conversación o el discurso.

Challenges and impossibilities of 'standing alongside' in an intolerable context: Learning from refugees and volunteers in the Calais camp.

This article describes the experience of setting up a psychosocial and therapeutic support project in the French Calais refugee camp, by a group of family therapists and clinical psychologists from the United Kingdom. This came about in response to reports of a humanitarian crisis unfolding on our doorstep, with the British government's lack of support for the growing numbers of refugees gathering along the UK border with France. The project involved working alongside other agencies in the camp to provide psychosocial and resilience-based therapeutic support to unaccompanied young people, women, children and their families and also to many volunteers in the camp. The process of setting up the work is described, as well as the challenges and dilemmas of offering an intervention in extremely unsafe and insanitary conditions, where for most the experience of trauma was ongoing. The project was informed by systemic-narrative practice and community/liberation psychology, which incorporate the political and social context. A narrative framework offered a way of drawing on people's strengths and resources, rooted in their cultural and social histories and helping them connect with preferred identities, which we found to be essential in the context of ongoing crisis.

Co-constructing a cross-cultural course: resisting and replicating colonizing practices.

This article examines the cross-cultural complexities of teaching and learning processes at different levels in a family therapy training program delivered in a different country. It presents two interlinked narratives of an advanced family therapy training program delivered in Slovenia by a U.K-based family therapy training institute. The context in which the training was negotiated and planned is discussed, highlighting issues at the macrosystemic level. Dilemmas that arose in relation to differing beliefs about teaching and learning are elaborated. We examine power relationships, ways that we positioned ourselves and each other, and how we tried and sometimes failed to take these into account. We question how the issue of spoken language and its meanings creates its own constraints and power structures, and how we respond to the impossibilities of translation. We argue that it is through the examination of uncomfortable processes that we develop self-reflexivity and work toward more equitable relationships.